From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 24253 invoked by alias); 10 Jul 2003 16:38:52 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 23816 invoked from network); 10 Jul 2003 16:38:40 -0000 Received: from unknown (63.201.54.26) by sources.redhat.com with QMTP; 10 Jul 2003 16:38:40 -0000 Received: (qmail 10307 invoked by uid 10); 10 Jul 2003 16:38:39 -0000 Received: (qmail 3766 invoked by uid 500); 10 Jul 2003 16:38:27 -0000 Mail-Followup-To: carlton@kealia.com, hjl@lucon.org, binutils@sources.redhat.com, gdb@sources.redhat.com, mec@shout.net To: Michael Elizabeth Chastain Cc: carlton@kealia.com, hjl@lucon.org, binutils@sources.redhat.com, gdb@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: FYI: A new C++ demangler References: <200307101542.h6AFgtuY009713@duracef.shout.net> From: Ian Lance Taylor Date: Thu, 10 Jul 2003 16:38:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: <200307101542.h6AFgtuY009713@duracef.shout.net> Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-SW-Source: 2003-07/txt/msg00135.txt.bz2 Michael Elizabeth Chastain writes: > I have kind of a silly question. Do I need to rebuild binutils and/or gcc > with the new demangler, or can I just rebuild gdb? That is, do gcc or > binutils ever need to run the demangler while compiling? Some of the binutils are linked against the demangler. This doesn't matter for compilation, only for error reporting and for the output of objdump and nm. I don't know whether this matters for your test bed. Ian