From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 26289 invoked by alias); 12 Aug 2009 19:19:45 -0000 Received: (qmail 26233 invoked by uid 22791); 12 Aug 2009 19:19:44 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.3 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx2.redhat.com (HELO mx2.redhat.com) (66.187.237.31) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Wed, 12 Aug 2009 19:19:37 +0000 Received: from int-mx2.corp.redhat.com (int-mx2.corp.redhat.com [172.16.27.26]) by mx2.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id n7CJJYwB009849; Wed, 12 Aug 2009 15:19:34 -0400 Received: from ns3.rdu.redhat.com (ns3.rdu.redhat.com [10.11.255.199]) by int-mx2.corp.redhat.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id n7CJJVr7011465; Wed, 12 Aug 2009 15:19:31 -0400 Received: from opsy.redhat.com (ovpn01.gateway.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.9.1]) by ns3.rdu.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id n7CJJUSs001153; Wed, 12 Aug 2009 15:19:30 -0400 Received: by opsy.redhat.com (Postfix, from userid 500) id 873043782F4; Wed, 12 Aug 2009 13:19:29 -0600 (MDT) To: "David Plumb" Cc: Subject: Re: incorrect address of class member References: <5630E8542965844685CBA4EB1C4785048EA900@cdnpostal.Intellon.com> From: Tom Tromey Reply-To: tromey@redhat.com Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2009 19:19:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: (Tom Tromey's message of "Wed\, 12 Aug 2009 08\:22\:47 -0600") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.3 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2009-08/txt/msg00087.txt.bz2 >>>>> "Tom" == Tom Tromey writes: Tom> I think it is a gcc bug, because readelf shows: [...] I tried gcc svn trunk today, and it still has the problem. I filed a gcc bug: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41048 Tom