From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 26957 invoked by alias); 13 Aug 2010 15:50:41 -0000 Received: (qmail 26947 invoked by uid 22791); 13 Aug 2010 15:50:40 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.1 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,SPF_HELO_PASS,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Fri, 13 Aug 2010 15:50:31 +0000 Received: from int-mx04.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx04.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.17]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o7DFoTwl025881 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Fri, 13 Aug 2010 11:50:29 -0400 Received: from ns3.rdu.redhat.com (ns3.rdu.redhat.com [10.11.255.199]) by int-mx04.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o7DFoTe0013377; Fri, 13 Aug 2010 11:50:29 -0400 Received: from opsy.redhat.com (ovpn01.gateway.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.9.1]) by ns3.rdu.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o7DFoSUl024803; Fri, 13 Aug 2010 11:50:28 -0400 Received: by opsy.redhat.com (Postfix, from userid 500) id 2B7FF3781C7; Fri, 13 Aug 2010 09:50:28 -0600 (MDT) From: Tom Tromey To: paawan oza Cc: gdb@sourceware.org Subject: Re: generic query regarding GPL and licensing terms associated with gdb References: <215382.96867.qm@web112514.mail.gq1.yahoo.com> Date: Fri, 13 Aug 2010 15:50:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: <215382.96867.qm@web112514.mail.gq1.yahoo.com> (paawan oza's message of "Thu, 12 Aug 2010 21:08:25 -0700 (PDT)") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.2 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2010-08/txt/msg00082.txt.bz2 >>>>> ">" == paawan oza writes: >> I have a doubt regarding licensing terms set by GPL under which gdb >> falls too. >> Is it legal to discuss the new idea on gdb public mailing list, where >> idea may be already implemented in organisation but person does not >> belong to the organisation. It is best to refer these questions to the FSF. There should be a contact listed on their web site. Tom