From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 10440 invoked by alias); 9 Mar 2009 19:51:08 -0000 Received: (qmail 10432 invoked by uid 22791); 9 Mar 2009 19:51:07 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.3 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx2.redhat.com (HELO mx2.redhat.com) (66.187.237.31) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Mon, 09 Mar 2009 19:51:03 +0000 Received: from int-mx2.corp.redhat.com (int-mx2.corp.redhat.com [172.16.27.26]) by mx2.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id n29JoxrJ018744; Mon, 9 Mar 2009 15:50:59 -0400 Received: from ns3.rdu.redhat.com (ns3.rdu.redhat.com [10.11.255.199]) by int-mx2.corp.redhat.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id n29JoxX7017299; Mon, 9 Mar 2009 15:50:59 -0400 Received: from opsy.redhat.com (vpn-12-128.rdu.redhat.com [10.11.12.128]) by ns3.rdu.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id n29Jow4Q024192; Mon, 9 Mar 2009 15:50:59 -0400 Received: by opsy.redhat.com (Postfix, from userid 500) id 224B63800CB; Mon, 9 Mar 2009 13:50:57 -0600 (MDT) To: teawater Cc: gdb ml Subject: Re: line_num of gdb_disassembly References: From: Tom Tromey Reply-To: tromey@redhat.com Date: Mon, 09 Mar 2009 19:51:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: (teawater@gmail.com's message of "Sun\, 8 Mar 2009 13\:48\:36 +0800") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.2 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2009-03/txt/msg00067.txt.bz2 >>>>> "teawater" == teawater writes: teawater> I found that the argument line_num of gdb_disassembly isn't teawater> used in anywhere. So maybe I can remove it. Go for it. teawater> And it can be checked in under the obvious rule, right? IMO, yes. Tom