From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 29951 invoked by alias); 11 Sep 2009 21:14:54 -0000 Received: (qmail 29942 invoked by uid 22791); 11 Sep 2009 21:14:53 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.4 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Fri, 11 Sep 2009 21:14:50 +0000 Received: from int-mx01.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx01.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.11]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id n8BLElqd008628; Fri, 11 Sep 2009 17:14:47 -0400 Received: from ns3.rdu.redhat.com (ns3.rdu.redhat.com [10.11.255.199]) by int-mx01.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id n8BLEka4003966; Fri, 11 Sep 2009 17:14:46 -0400 Received: from opsy.redhat.com (ovpn01.gateway.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.9.1]) by ns3.rdu.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id n8BLEjo8002958; Fri, 11 Sep 2009 17:14:45 -0400 Received: by opsy.redhat.com (Postfix, from userid 500) id F0CC8378188; Fri, 11 Sep 2009 15:14:44 -0600 (MDT) From: Tom Tromey To: Paul Pluzhnikov Cc: gdb Subject: Re: internal-error: find_size_for_pointer_math: Assertion `TYPE_CODE (ptr_type) == TYPE_CODE_PTR' failed. References: <8ac60eac0909111351m7fd6a64eyb52f8e45030b0868@mail.gmail.com> Reply-To: Tom Tromey Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2009 21:14:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: <8ac60eac0909111351m7fd6a64eyb52f8e45030b0868@mail.gmail.com> (Paul Pluzhnikov's message of "Fri, 11 Sep 2009 13:51:12 -0700") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.1 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2009-09/txt/msg00168.txt.bz2 >>>>> "Paul" == Paul Pluzhnikov writes: Paul> Should we have a 'python' component in bugzilla? Yeah. Paul> I just stumbled on above assert in current CVS Head. Thanks, I'll look into it. Tom