From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 572 invoked by alias); 18 Feb 2010 23:04:45 -0000 Received: (qmail 563 invoked by uid 22791); 18 Feb 2010 23:04:44 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.7 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Thu, 18 Feb 2010 23:04:40 +0000 Received: from int-mx01.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx01.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.11]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o1IN4Unf008945 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Thu, 18 Feb 2010 18:04:31 -0500 Received: from ns3.rdu.redhat.com (ns3.rdu.redhat.com [10.11.255.199]) by int-mx01.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o1IN4UDO005629; Thu, 18 Feb 2010 18:04:30 -0500 Received: from opsy.redhat.com (ovpn01.gateway.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.9.1]) by ns3.rdu.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o1IN4T1M014661; Thu, 18 Feb 2010 18:04:29 -0500 Received: by opsy.redhat.com (Postfix, from userid 500) id A22B9378212; Thu, 18 Feb 2010 16:04:28 -0700 (MST) From: Tom Tromey To: Stan Shebs Cc: gdb@sourceware.org Subject: Re: CORE_ADDR representation References: <20100218044416.GA19485@caradoc.them.org> <4B7CD31F.2070006@codesourcery.com> <20100218141147.GB18535@caradoc.them.org> Reply-To: tromey@redhat.com Date: Thu, 18 Feb 2010 23:04:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: <20100218141147.GB18535@caradoc.them.org> (Daniel Jacobowitz's message of "Thu, 18 Feb 2010 09:11:48 -0500") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.1 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2010-02/txt/msg00134.txt.bz2 >>>>> "Daniel" == Daniel Jacobowitz writes: >> I would say to declare that CORE_ADDR is fundamentally 0..memtop, so >> it should be unsigned and zero-extend. >> >> Can unsigned->signed->diddle->unsigned be encapsulated for MIPS only? Daniel> I don't know that it can't. I think I discussed this with Daniel> Andrew many years ago, and he thought that it couldn't; but I Daniel> can't find the details... Maybe this thread: http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb/2002-09/threads.html#00078 Tom