From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 25264 invoked by alias); 29 Jun 2009 18:26:04 -0000 Received: (qmail 25256 invoked by uid 22791); 29 Jun 2009 18:26:04 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.3 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx2.redhat.com (HELO mx2.redhat.com) (66.187.237.31) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Mon, 29 Jun 2009 18:25:59 +0000 Received: from int-mx2.corp.redhat.com (int-mx2.corp.redhat.com [172.16.27.26]) by mx2.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id n5TIPrBM003832; Mon, 29 Jun 2009 14:25:53 -0400 Received: from ns3.rdu.redhat.com (ns3.rdu.redhat.com [10.11.255.199]) by int-mx2.corp.redhat.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id n5TIPqn7003728; Mon, 29 Jun 2009 14:25:52 -0400 Received: from opsy.redhat.com (vpn-225-41.phx2.redhat.com [10.3.225.41]) by ns3.rdu.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id n5TIPpnP026085; Mon, 29 Jun 2009 14:25:52 -0400 Received: by opsy.redhat.com (Postfix, from userid 500) id 6DA53508238; Mon, 29 Jun 2009 12:25:51 -0600 (MDT) To: Paul Pluzhnikov Cc: Niko Sams , gdb Subject: Re: Execute code in python pretty printers References: <629542d40906281214x73c3b505nfeb7e7eecfb1f708@mail.gmail.com> <8ac60eac0906291050k52e534a9peab3aa2b2345dbe@mail.gmail.com> From: Tom Tromey Reply-To: tromey@redhat.com Date: Mon, 29 Jun 2009 18:26:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: <8ac60eac0906291050k52e534a9peab3aa2b2345dbe@mail.gmail.com> (Paul Pluzhnikov's message of "Mon\, 29 Jun 2009 10\:50\:41 -0700") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.2 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2009-06/txt/msg00311.txt.bz2 >>>>> "Paul" == Paul Pluzhnikov writes: Paul> On Mon, Jun 29, 2009 at 10:07 AM, Tom Tromey wrote: Niko> So to find out the parent the method has to be executed. Niko> Is this possible? >> >> No, we have not implemented inferior function calls on Value yet. Paul> But I believe it *is* possible (if ugly): Paul> http://sourceware.org/ml/archer/2009-q2/msg00197.html This reminds me -- I'm curious about the crashes you were seeing. Could you file a bug report? I wonder whether these make will it difficult to implement the feature in a real way later one. Tom