From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 7312 invoked by alias); 9 Sep 2009 17:46:49 -0000 Received: (qmail 7265 invoked by uid 22791); 9 Sep 2009 17:46:48 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.4 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Wed, 09 Sep 2009 17:46:44 +0000 Received: from int-mx02.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx02.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.12]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id n89HkeL2009910; Wed, 9 Sep 2009 13:46:41 -0400 Received: from ns3.rdu.redhat.com (ns3.rdu.redhat.com [10.11.255.199]) by int-mx02.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id n89HkeFa006847; Wed, 9 Sep 2009 13:46:40 -0400 Received: from opsy.redhat.com (ovpn01.gateway.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.9.1]) by ns3.rdu.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id n89Hkd6g011052; Wed, 9 Sep 2009 13:46:39 -0400 Received: by opsy.redhat.com (Postfix, from userid 500) id B2E5A378182; Wed, 9 Sep 2009 11:46:38 -0600 (MDT) From: Tom Tromey To: Doug Evans Cc: Paul Pluzhnikov , gdb@sourceware.org Subject: Re: TYPE_NAME memory management References: Reply-To: Tom Tromey Date: Wed, 09 Sep 2009 17:46:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: (Doug Evans's message of "Wed, 9 Sep 2009 09:40:39 -0700") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.1 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2009-09/txt/msg00146.txt.bz2 >>>>> "Doug" == Doug Evans writes: Doug> In an effort to move this along, how about if we partition the Doug> objfile_data cleanups into two steps. Given that we don't want to Doug> require an ordering on the objfile_data cleanups, and (to phrase it Doug> one way) we need to allow different modules' cleanups to refer to Doug> other module's "objfile_data", and given my lack of skill in picking Doug> good names, suppose we call the first step "save" and we call the Doug> second step "free". This sounds like a good idea to me. Tom