From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 13872 invoked by alias); 7 Mar 2012 21:42:29 -0000 Received: (qmail 13863 invoked by uid 22791); 7 Mar 2012 21:42:28 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.7 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,SPF_HELO_PASS,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Wed, 07 Mar 2012 21:42:11 +0000 Received: from int-mx11.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx11.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.24]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id q27LftfF001016 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Wed, 7 Mar 2012 16:41:55 -0500 Received: from psique (ovpn-112-58.phx2.redhat.com [10.3.112.58]) by int-mx11.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id q27LfmKe021305; Wed, 7 Mar 2012 16:41:50 -0500 From: Sergio Durigan Junior To: Joel Brobecker Cc: Giuseppe Scrivano , gdb@sourceware.org, jemarch@gnu.org, Abhijit Halder Subject: Re: Google Summer of Code 2012 References: <87399o8kk8.fsf@gnu.org> <20120307000059.GT2867@adacore.com> X-URL: http://www.redhat.com Date: Wed, 07 Mar 2012 21:42:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: <20120307000059.GT2867@adacore.com> (Joel Brobecker's message of "Tue, 6 Mar 2012 16:00:59 -0800") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.3 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2012-03/txt/msg00023.txt.bz2 On Tuesday, March 06 2012, Joel Brobecker wrote: > Giuseppe, > >> I was going trough the list of ideas we had for the Google Summer of >> Code 2011. >> >> Is this list http://sourceware.org/gdb/wiki/SummerOfCode2011/Ideas still >> valid? Could you please create a new page "SummerOfCode2012"? > > The page still seems reasonably up to date. Ref: "Support pipes in the run command" I am CCing Abhijit, the guy who has an implementation for the pipe support inside GDB. As far as I remember, the patch has not yet been accepted, but it has been heavily reviewed and I think is very close to be pushed upstream. If this is correct, then you might want to remove that item from the list. -- Sergio