From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 5036 invoked by alias); 12 Dec 2008 23:30:29 -0000 Received: (qmail 5019 invoked by uid 22791); 12 Dec 2008 23:30:28 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx2.redhat.com (HELO mx2.redhat.com) (66.187.237.31) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Fri, 12 Dec 2008 23:29:47 +0000 Received: from int-mx2.corp.redhat.com (int-mx2.corp.redhat.com [172.16.27.26]) by mx2.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id mBCNTgRK023870; Fri, 12 Dec 2008 18:29:42 -0500 Received: from ns3.rdu.redhat.com (ns3.rdu.redhat.com [10.11.255.199]) by int-mx2.corp.redhat.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id mBCNTfNu014579; Fri, 12 Dec 2008 18:29:41 -0500 Received: from opsy.redhat.com (vpn-14-12.rdu.redhat.com [10.11.14.12]) by ns3.rdu.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id mBCNTdUK016345; Fri, 12 Dec 2008 18:29:40 -0500 Received: by opsy.redhat.com (Postfix, from userid 500) id 19647378611; Fri, 12 Dec 2008 16:29:39 -0700 (MST) To: Paul Pluzhnikov Cc: ajloft@umich.edu, gdb@sourceware.org Subject: Re: "Cannot find new threads" on Fedora 9, but not on CentOS 5 (?) References: <4907B915.5040101@gmail.com> <8ac60eac0810281920r4bf71400hc8171bdee3c92ca@mail.gmail.com> <490909B3.2080307@gmail.com> <8ac60eac0810291830g46604c3eye8365240c48007d0@mail.gmail.com> <490BBEF4.1040801@gmail.com> <8ac60eac0810312346l638f3011n66d7681444329486@mail.gmail.com> <490C75B4.20001@gmail.com> <8ac60eac0811011440g46fcd9a6uda48e1c3b25eb776@mail.gmail.com> <20081212230346.GA12648@caradoc.them.org> From: Tom Tromey Reply-To: tromey@redhat.com Date: Fri, 12 Dec 2008 23:30:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: <20081212230346.GA12648@caradoc.them.org> (Daniel Jacobowitz's message of "Fri\, 12 Dec 2008 18\:03\:46 -0500") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.2 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2008-12/txt/msg00049.txt.bz2 >>>>> "Daniel" == Daniel Jacobowitz writes: Tom> My summary of the discussion is that someone will have to dig into the Tom> problem in depth. My understanding is that Ulrich does not like that Tom> patch. But, neither of us knows enough about this part of gdb to say Tom> what it may be doing wrong. Daniel> I don't suppose you can be any more specific? I agree that the Daniel> dl-load.c bit is ugly, but at least the other portion seems clearly Daniel> correct and I don't understand how the fault token shifted back to Daniel> GDB. The above really does convey the gist of our conversation. I'm somewhat uncomfortable trying to act as an intermediary in a discussion where I really know nothing about the problem. I will try to educate myself a bit so I can come up with good followup questions. Tom