From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 26815 invoked by alias); 2 Apr 2009 17:36:15 -0000 Received: (qmail 26581 invoked by uid 22791); 2 Apr 2009 17:36:14 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.3 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx2.redhat.com (HELO mx2.redhat.com) (66.187.237.31) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Thu, 02 Apr 2009 17:36:08 +0000 Received: from int-mx2.corp.redhat.com (int-mx2.corp.redhat.com [172.16.27.26]) by mx2.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id n32HZQk9017183; Thu, 2 Apr 2009 13:35:26 -0400 Received: from ns3.rdu.redhat.com (ns3.rdu.redhat.com [10.11.255.199]) by int-mx2.corp.redhat.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id n32HZQik008877; Thu, 2 Apr 2009 13:35:26 -0400 Received: from opsy.redhat.com (vpn-12-111.rdu.redhat.com [10.11.12.111]) by ns3.rdu.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id n32HZOsM011542; Thu, 2 Apr 2009 13:35:25 -0400 Received: by opsy.redhat.com (Postfix, from userid 500) id 4BF0A3784C0; Thu, 2 Apr 2009 11:35:21 -0600 (MDT) To: Joel Brobecker Cc: gdb@sourceware.org Subject: Re: gdb 7.0: 5 weeks to branch-time... References: <20090401215827.GF8930@adacore.com> <20090402173129.GL8930@adacore.com> From: Tom Tromey Reply-To: Tom Tromey Date: Thu, 02 Apr 2009 17:36:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: <20090402173129.GL8930@adacore.com> (Joel Brobecker's message of "Thu\, 2 Apr 2009 10\:31\:29 -0700") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.2 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2009-04/txt/msg00026.txt.bz2 >>>>> "Joel" == Joel Brobecker writes: >> 1. Pretty-printing base classes in C++. Phil is putting the finishing >> touches on the fix for this now. Joel> I've updated the wiki to mention these two issues. Would either of you Joel> mind updating the wiki again when it's taken care of? No problem. Phil checked in the fix for #1 today. So, it will show up in the initial submission of this feature. He's started work on #2 now as well :-) Tom