From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 26274 invoked by alias); 2 Oct 2009 16:03:16 -0000 Received: (qmail 26063 invoked by uid 22791); 2 Oct 2009 16:03:15 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.4 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Fri, 02 Oct 2009 16:03:09 +0000 Received: from int-mx03.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx03.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.16]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id n92G0VY6011764; Fri, 2 Oct 2009 12:00:31 -0400 Received: from ns3.rdu.redhat.com (ns3.rdu.redhat.com [10.11.255.199]) by int-mx03.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id n92G0Urc011675; Fri, 2 Oct 2009 12:00:30 -0400 Received: from opsy.redhat.com (ovpn01.gateway.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.9.1]) by ns3.rdu.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id n92G0SvI008781; Fri, 2 Oct 2009 12:00:29 -0400 Received: by opsy.redhat.com (Postfix, from userid 500) id 36197378312; Fri, 2 Oct 2009 10:00:28 -0600 (MDT) From: Tom Tromey To: Joel Brobecker Cc: Paul Pluzhnikov , Jack Howarth , Anirban Sinha , gdb@sourceware.org, Michael Snyder Subject: Re: FW: gdb seems to be broken on darwin 10.5.8 and later References: <8ac60eac0909302034s3f67ed8fxc84fa5544740dd21@mail.gmail.com> <20091002015530.GB29817@bromo.med.uc.edu> <8ac60eac0910011913v762a312eh7edb63c9e3730586@mail.gmail.com> <20091002153739.GN6532@adacore.com> Reply-To: tromey@redhat.com Date: Fri, 02 Oct 2009 16:03:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: <20091002153739.GN6532@adacore.com> (Joel Brobecker's message of "Fri, 2 Oct 2009 08:37:39 -0700") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.1 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2009-10/txt/msg00041.txt.bz2 >>>>> "Joel" == Joel Brobecker writes: >> I am not sure how Joel wants to handle this WRT the 7.0 branch; none >> of the other maintainers chimed in :-( Joel> Did Jack confirm that it does not work without applying your patch? I read the referenced email. If the only issue with the patch is that it is not the best possible way to fix the problem, then I think it might as well go in. I say that because I think it generally preferable to commit a functioning patch rather than wait for a more ideal patch. Tom