From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-return-40345-listarch-gdb=sources.redhat.com@sourceware.org>
Received: (qmail 16354 invoked by alias); 7 Jan 2012 03:20:51 -0000
Received: (qmail 16346 invoked by uid 22791); 7 Jan 2012 03:20:50 -0000
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.7 required=5.0	tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,SPF_HELO_PASS,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28)    by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Sat, 07 Jan 2012 03:20:33 +0000
Received: from int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.22])	by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id q073KW0a011286	(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK);	Fri, 6 Jan 2012 22:20:32 -0500
Received: from psique ([10.3.112.15])	by int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id q073KRBV024247;	Fri, 6 Jan 2012 22:20:29 -0500
From: Sergio Durigan Junior <sergiodj@redhat.com>
To: gdb@sourceware.org
Cc: Pedro Alves <alves.ped@gmail.com>, Tom Tromey <tromey@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: UST integration is broken
References: <m3sjjsgrv2.fsf@redhat.com>
Date: Sat, 07 Jan 2012 03:20:00 -0000
In-Reply-To: <m3sjjsgrv2.fsf@redhat.com> (Sergio Durigan Junior's message of	"Sat, 07 Jan 2012 00:37:37 -0200")
Message-ID: <m3k454gpvp.fsf@redhat.com>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.3 (gnu/linux)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-IsSubscribed: yes
Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gdb.sourceware.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-subscribe@sourceware.org>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb@sourceware.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-help@sourceware.org>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org
X-SW-Source: 2012-01/txt/msg00027.txt.bz2

Sergio Durigan Junior <sergiodj@redhat.com> writes:

> I also noticed that the header file ust/ust.h is not installed, thus
> making the configure process useless.  I am sending this message because
> I am in doubt about what to do: should we completely remove the support
> from GDB (since according to the commit message above, the
> implementation is going to be revamp'ed), or just temporarily disable
> it?  I was going to send a patch for the latter, but decided to ask
> first.

Or we could just check for the UST version, and not compile if it is
greater than XYZ.