From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 20419 invoked by alias); 27 Jul 2009 16:17:31 -0000 Received: (qmail 20410 invoked by uid 22791); 27 Jul 2009 16:17:29 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.3 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx2.redhat.com (HELO mx2.redhat.com) (66.187.237.31) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Mon, 27 Jul 2009 16:17:23 +0000 Received: from int-mx2.corp.redhat.com (int-mx2.corp.redhat.com [172.16.27.26]) by mx2.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id n6RGH6bn031571; Mon, 27 Jul 2009 12:17:06 -0400 Received: from ns3.rdu.redhat.com (ns3.rdu.redhat.com [10.11.255.199]) by int-mx2.corp.redhat.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id n6RGH407011230; Mon, 27 Jul 2009 12:17:04 -0400 Received: from opsy.redhat.com (ovpn01.gateway.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.9.1]) by ns3.rdu.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id n6RGH3qi008055; Mon, 27 Jul 2009 12:17:03 -0400 Received: by opsy.redhat.com (Postfix, from userid 500) id 162713782CF; Mon, 27 Jul 2009 10:17:03 -0600 (MDT) To: nickrob@snap.net.nz (Nick Roberts) Cc: "Marc Khouzam" , Subject: Re: [RFC] Queries and frontends References: <6D19CA8D71C89C43A057926FE0D4ADAA07C00023@ecamlmw720.eamcs.ericsson.se> <19045.23703.743876.775308@totara.tehura.co.nz> <19053.2107.342469.683795@totara.tehura.co.nz> From: Tom Tromey Reply-To: Tom Tromey Date: Mon, 27 Jul 2009 16:17:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: <19053.2107.342469.683795@totara.tehura.co.nz> (Nick Roberts's message of "Mon\, 27 Jul 2009 13\:51\:55 +1200") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.3 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2009-07/txt/msg00212.txt.bz2 >>>>> "Nick" == Nick Roberts writes: Nick> I don't quite follow. AFAIK defaulted_query knows nothing about Nick> server_command. Yes, but it could. Since "server" is intended to hide commands from the user, why check server_command at one particular query rather than in every query? Nick> Hui has suggested adding a special command but I don't understand how his Nick> proposed "maintenance print target-stack" relates to queries. Me neither. Tom