From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 32144 invoked by alias); 7 Dec 2009 20:57:18 -0000 Received: (qmail 32120 invoked by uid 22791); 7 Dec 2009 20:57:16 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Mon, 07 Dec 2009 20:57:05 +0000 Received: from int-mx05.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx05.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.18]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id nB7KuLCi030241 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Mon, 7 Dec 2009 15:56:21 -0500 Received: from ns3.rdu.redhat.com (ns3.rdu.redhat.com [10.11.255.199]) by int-mx05.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id nB7KuLFO011068; Mon, 7 Dec 2009 15:56:21 -0500 Received: from opsy.redhat.com (ovpn01.gateway.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.9.1]) by ns3.rdu.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id nB7KuKpI004765; Mon, 7 Dec 2009 15:56:20 -0500 Received: by opsy.redhat.com (Postfix, from userid 500) id D8C1E3782A2; Mon, 7 Dec 2009 13:56:19 -0700 (MST) From: Tom Tromey To: Joel Brobecker Cc: Michael Snyder , gdb@sourceware.org Subject: Re: Red Hat PIE patch References: <4B1A9FA4.7000001@vmware.com> <20091205193211.GK2903@adacore.com> Reply-To: tromey@redhat.com Date: Mon, 07 Dec 2009 20:57:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: <20091205193211.GK2903@adacore.com> (Joel Brobecker's message of "Sat, 5 Dec 2009 11:32:11 -0800") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.1 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2009-12/txt/msg00042.txt.bz2 >>>>> "Joel" == Joel Brobecker writes: >> Does anyone know anything about a "Red Hat PIE patch" >> for position independent executables? Has it been merged? >> If not, where can I find the most recent version? Joel> Jan re-submitted a series recently, and Tom reviewed most if not Joel> all of them. You should be able to find the relevant messages Joel> in the Nov archives. I have not yet reviewed numbers 9, 12, and 14. These touched on things that I am less familiar with. I hope to get to them, but if someone else wants to take a look, that is fine with me. Tom