From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 7482 invoked by alias); 22 Mar 2011 16:58:11 -0000 Received: (qmail 7474 invoked by uid 22791); 22 Mar 2011 16:58:11 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.9 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,SPF_HELO_PASS,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Tue, 22 Mar 2011 16:58:00 +0000 Received: from int-mx01.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx01.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.11]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id p2MGvtdn008875 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Tue, 22 Mar 2011 12:57:56 -0400 Received: from ns3.rdu.redhat.com (ns3.rdu.redhat.com [10.11.255.199]) by int-mx01.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id p2MGvtm1016652; Tue, 22 Mar 2011 12:57:55 -0400 Received: from opsy.redhat.com (ovpn01.gateway.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.9.1]) by ns3.rdu.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id p2MGvs9u014523; Tue, 22 Mar 2011 12:57:54 -0400 Received: by opsy.redhat.com (Postfix, from userid 500) id E60B2378491; Tue, 22 Mar 2011 10:57:53 -0600 (MDT) From: Tom Tromey To: Jan Kratochvil Cc: gdb@sourceware.org, Kai Tietz , Eli Zaretskii , Christopher Faylor Subject: Re: readline rebase 5.1->6.2? References: <20110322154327.GA8966@host1.jankratochvil.net> Date: Tue, 22 Mar 2011 16:58:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: <20110322154327.GA8966@host1.jankratochvil.net> (Jan Kratochvil's message of "Tue, 22 Mar 2011 16:43:27 +0100") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.2 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2011-03/txt/msg00121.txt.bz2 >>>>> "Jan" == Jan Kratochvil writes: Jan> it is a bity pity the sourceware tree still bundles readline-5.1 Jan> while distros build GDB with readline less than 5 years old. [...] Jan> Before 7.3 cut off I ask about the opinion on these MS-related platforms Jan> compatibility readline patches, Fedora GNU/Linux runs fine with Jan> readline-6.1-2.fc14 with readline-6.2-2.fc15 soon to be GA and also no Jan> reported problems. I think upgrading is a good idea, but I think any upgrade should be done on the trunk after 7.3 branches -- the sooner after the branch is made, the better. Tom