From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 10610 invoked by alias); 3 Dec 2003 17:34:40 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 10597 invoked from network); 3 Dec 2003 17:34:39 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO yosemite.airs.com) (209.128.65.135) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 3 Dec 2003 17:34:39 -0000 Received: (qmail 5893 invoked by uid 10); 3 Dec 2003 17:34:38 -0000 Received: (qmail 2381 invoked by uid 500); 3 Dec 2003 17:34:31 -0000 From: Ian Lance Taylor To: Daniel Jacobowitz Cc: Michael Elizabeth Chastain , ac131313@redhat.com, gdb@sources.redhat.com, wcohen@redhat.com Subject: Re: Slow handling of C++ symbol names References: <20031203164734.201124B35B@berman.michael-chastain.com> <20031203170823.GA9475@nevyn.them.org> Date: Wed, 03 Dec 2003 17:34:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: <20031203170823.GA9475@nevyn.them.org> Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-SW-Source: 2003-12/txt/msg00048.txt.bz2 Daniel Jacobowitz writes: > GDB never does set DMGL_VERBOSE. Are you sure the old demangler > wouldn't produce that without DMGL_VERBOSE? > > Maybe the old demangler had a test reversed. ISTR that c++filt passes > DMGL_VERBOSE, and that generates std::string rather than > std::basic_string for the above. Well, hmmm. The code looks right to me. When I run my copy of c++filt built with the old demangler, I get the long string, as expected. I note that DMGL_VERBOSE was only added on 2002-02-05, so if you're using a c++filt from sources before that you will get the smaller demangling. Ian