From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 3994 invoked by alias); 16 Dec 2008 01:04:54 -0000 Received: (qmail 2793 invoked by uid 22791); 16 Dec 2008 01:03:46 -0000 Received: from mx2.redhat.com (HELO mx2.redhat.com) (66.187.237.31) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Tue, 16 Dec 2008 01:03:15 +0000 Received: from int-mx2.corp.redhat.com (int-mx2.corp.redhat.com [172.16.27.26]) by mx2.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id mBG11Dm1030499; Mon, 15 Dec 2008 20:01:13 -0500 Received: from ns3.rdu.redhat.com (ns3.rdu.redhat.com [10.11.255.199]) by int-mx2.corp.redhat.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id mBG11COm000989; Mon, 15 Dec 2008 20:01:12 -0500 Received: from opsy.redhat.com (vpn-13-69.rdu.redhat.com [10.11.13.69]) by ns3.rdu.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id mBG11BPl031555; Mon, 15 Dec 2008 20:01:11 -0500 Received: by opsy.redhat.com (Postfix, from userid 500) id 41E7788803F; Mon, 15 Dec 2008 18:01:10 -0700 (MST) To: Pedro Alves Cc: gdb@sourceware.org Subject: Re: MultiProcess branch mentioned in the wiki References: <200812081653.44594.pedro@codesourcery.com> From: Tom Tromey Reply-To: tromey@redhat.com Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2008 01:04:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: <200812081653.44594.pedro@codesourcery.com> (Pedro Alves's message of "Mon\, 8 Dec 2008 16\:53\:44 +0000") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.2 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2008-12/txt/msg00067.txt.bz2 >>>>> "Pedro" == Pedro Alves writes: Pedro> I've finally drafted a wiki page for the multi-process / Pedro> multi-exec work. Check it out at: Pedro> http://sourceware.org/gdb/wiki/MultiProcess Thanks. I read through this. About the shared library support: I also didn't see a mention of how objfiles will be handled. On the one hand, it seems important to share them across inferiors. On the other hand, IIUC, they are relocated; so sharing will be hard due to address space randomization. Maybe this just isn't on your immediate list? Also, if you know offhand what is involved in "Linux native support", that would be interesting information to have. Tom