From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 28860 invoked by alias); 13 Apr 2011 13:57:36 -0000 Received: (qmail 28852 invoked by uid 22791); 13 Apr 2011 13:57:36 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.9 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,SPF_HELO_PASS,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Wed, 13 Apr 2011 13:57:25 +0000 Received: from int-mx10.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx10.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.23]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id p3DDvN6u032706 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Wed, 13 Apr 2011 09:57:23 -0400 Received: from ns3.rdu.redhat.com (ns3.rdu.redhat.com [10.11.255.199]) by int-mx10.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id p3DDvMhA008440; Wed, 13 Apr 2011 09:57:22 -0400 Received: from opsy.redhat.com (ovpn01.gateway.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.9.1]) by ns3.rdu.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id p3DDvLx0016067; Wed, 13 Apr 2011 09:57:21 -0400 Received: by opsy.redhat.com (Postfix, from userid 500) id BAB40378BE1; Wed, 13 Apr 2011 07:57:20 -0600 (MDT) From: Tom Tromey To: BarrRobot Cc: gdb@sourceware.org Subject: Re: MI Interface - interpretation of value returned by -stack-list-locals (C++) References: <31246347.post@talk.nabble.com> <31268868.post@talk.nabble.com> Date: Wed, 13 Apr 2011 13:57:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: (Dodji Seketeli's message of "Sat, 09 Apr 2011 13:50:24 +0200") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.2 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2011-04/txt/msg00042.txt.bz2 Dodji> Just out of curiosity, Have you filled an enhancement request for this Dodji> yet? Yes, please file bugs and requests. Dodji> It works great, but at this point I feel like any round trip that Dodji> could be saved can actually make a user visible difference :-) It would be great to have some data on the importance of this. Another thing for my to-do list I guess... or yours ;-) Tom