From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 11900 invoked by alias); 29 Mar 2011 14:54:53 -0000 Received: (qmail 11887 invoked by uid 22791); 29 Mar 2011 14:54:52 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.9 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,SPF_HELO_PASS,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Tue, 29 Mar 2011 14:54:38 +0000 Received: from int-mx12.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx12.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.25]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id p2TEsV3v029751 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Tue, 29 Mar 2011 10:54:31 -0400 Received: from ns3.rdu.redhat.com (ns3.rdu.redhat.com [10.11.255.199]) by int-mx12.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id p2TEsVd0007882; Tue, 29 Mar 2011 10:54:31 -0400 Received: from opsy.redhat.com (ovpn01.gateway.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.9.1]) by ns3.rdu.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id p2TEsUTX019629; Tue, 29 Mar 2011 10:54:30 -0400 Received: by opsy.redhat.com (Postfix, from userid 500) id EA32F378BE8; Tue, 29 Mar 2011 08:54:29 -0600 (MDT) From: Tom Tromey To: Edjunior Barbosa Machado Cc: gdb@sourceware.org Subject: Re: question, re: gdb.base/label.exp References: <4D658D9B.80207@vmware.com> <4D66A1A8.2010503@vmware.com> <20110224192603.GA22762@host1.dyn.jankratochvil.net> <20110225091943.GA1314@host1.dyn.jankratochvil.net> <4D91EE45.10407@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Date: Tue, 29 Mar 2011 14:54:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: <4D91EE45.10407@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (Edjunior Barbosa Machado's message of "Tue, 29 Mar 2011 11:35:49 -0300") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.2 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2011-03/txt/msg00173.txt.bz2 >>>>> "Edjunior" == Edjunior Barbosa Machado writes: Edjunior> just clarifying, this means it should be fixed on gcc anyway? Edjunior> I also ran into the same problem on RHEL5 and, although the Edjunior> testcase passes ok on RHEL6, DW_AT_decl_line for label 'here' Edjunior> still seems incorrect (16, instead of 9). I changed this code in GDB this past week. Now GDB looks at the label's DW_AT_low_pc, not DW_AT_decl_line. I don't know whether there are bugs with this in older versions of GCC. Tom