From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 32709 invoked by alias); 7 Oct 2011 15:43:57 -0000 Received: (qmail 32697 invoked by uid 22791); 7 Oct 2011 15:43:56 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-7.2 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_HELO_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Fri, 07 Oct 2011 15:43:42 +0000 Received: from int-mx10.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx10.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.23]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id p97Fhbdm018093 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Fri, 7 Oct 2011 11:43:37 -0400 Received: from ns3.rdu.redhat.com (ns3.rdu.redhat.com [10.11.255.199]) by int-mx10.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id p97FhaHV004887; Fri, 7 Oct 2011 11:43:36 -0400 Received: from barimba (ovpn01.gateway.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.9.1]) by ns3.rdu.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id p97FhYKr016609; Fri, 7 Oct 2011 11:43:35 -0400 From: Tom Tromey To: Pedro Alves Cc: Doug Evans , gdb@sourceware.org Subject: Re: program spaces vs exec References: <20111005181526.B6CCA2461D1@ruffy.mtv.corp.google.com> <201110061942.49805.pedro@codesourcery.com> <201110062041.09462.pedro@codesourcery.com> Date: Fri, 07 Oct 2011 15:43:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: <201110062041.09462.pedro@codesourcery.com> (Pedro Alves's message of "Thu, 6 Oct 2011 20:41:09 +0100") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2011-10/txt/msg00041.txt.bz2 >>>>> "Pedro" == Pedro Alves writes: Pedro> Then this isn't just about execs indeed, and I don't understand Pedro> the usefulness of attaching a printer to the program space. I don't remember the rationale, Doug would have to answer that. Tom