From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 20217 invoked by alias); 4 Feb 2009 19:17:57 -0000 Received: (qmail 20207 invoked by uid 22791); 4 Feb 2009 19:17:56 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.3 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx2.redhat.com (HELO mx2.redhat.com) (66.187.237.31) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Wed, 04 Feb 2009 19:17:50 +0000 Received: from int-mx2.corp.redhat.com (int-mx2.corp.redhat.com [172.16.27.26]) by mx2.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id n14JHkTt026184; Wed, 4 Feb 2009 14:17:46 -0500 Received: from ns3.rdu.redhat.com (ns3.rdu.redhat.com [10.11.255.199]) by int-mx2.corp.redhat.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id n14JHk56007888; Wed, 4 Feb 2009 14:17:46 -0500 Received: from opsy.redhat.com (vpn-14-42.rdu.redhat.com [10.11.14.42]) by ns3.rdu.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id n14JHj8e018333; Wed, 4 Feb 2009 14:17:46 -0500 Received: by opsy.redhat.com (Postfix, from userid 500) id B59DB3785DA; Wed, 4 Feb 2009 12:17:43 -0700 (MST) To: Joel Brobecker Cc: gdb@sourceware.org Subject: Re: Discussing the next GDB release (GDB 7.0?) References: <20090115034552.GF24105@adacore.com> From: Tom Tromey Reply-To: Tom Tromey Date: Wed, 04 Feb 2009 19:17:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: (Tom Tromey's message of "Thu\, 15 Jan 2009 10\:16\:43 -0700") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.2 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2009-02/txt/msg00033.txt.bz2 >>>>> "Tom" == Tom Tromey writes: Tom> I think a reasonable goal would be to ship the Python-based Tom> pretty-printing feature. [...] Tom> I'm happy to start submitting the remaining patches from the list. I just wanted to post to explain why there have not been any pretty-printing patches forthcoming. After feedback from users, we're changing the way that pretty-printers are looked up. This should not take too long to change (I don't have a target date, but Phil is actively working on it), and I think it is fairly important to get this in shape before putting the code into gdb. Tom