From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 5538 invoked by alias); 7 Apr 2010 20:31:54 -0000 Received: (qmail 5529 invoked by uid 22791); 7 Apr 2010 20:31:53 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,SPF_HELO_PASS,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Wed, 07 Apr 2010 20:31:48 +0000 Received: from int-mx04.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx04.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.17]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o37KVkpb017817 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Wed, 7 Apr 2010 16:31:46 -0400 Received: from ns3.rdu.redhat.com (ns3.rdu.redhat.com [10.11.255.199]) by int-mx04.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o37KVjd7019434; Wed, 7 Apr 2010 16:31:45 -0400 Received: from opsy.redhat.com (ovpn01.gateway.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.9.1]) by ns3.rdu.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o37KVhlK002143; Wed, 7 Apr 2010 16:31:44 -0400 Received: by opsy.redhat.com (Postfix, from userid 500) id B4082379851; Wed, 7 Apr 2010 14:31:43 -0600 (MDT) From: Tom Tromey To: Michel METZGER Cc: gdb@sourceware.org Subject: Re: Batch mode and errors References: <4BBBB093.2050809@st.com> Reply-To: tromey@redhat.com Date: Wed, 07 Apr 2010 20:31:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: <4BBBB093.2050809@st.com> (Michel METZGER's message of "Tue, 06 Apr 2010 18:07:15 -0400") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.1 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2010-04/txt/msg00026.txt.bz2 >>>>> "Michel" == Michel METZGER writes: Michel> I was wondering if it was possible to run gdb in batch mode and force Michel> it to execute the entire script I provide with --command even if Michel> it contains errors. I want to test the error handling of our new Michel> commands and it would be really helpful! Not that I know of, sorry. If you control the contents of the file, you could do something ugly like run each separate command through 'python' and have it use try/catch around gdb.execute. Tom