From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 2674 invoked by alias); 13 Feb 2013 07:35:21 -0000 Received: (qmail 2612 invoked by uid 22791); 13 Feb 2013 07:35:20 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.2 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KHOP_RCVD_UNTRUST,KHOP_SPAMHAUS_DROP,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_W,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_HELO_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Wed, 13 Feb 2013 07:35:14 +0000 Received: from int-mx02.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx02.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.12]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id r1D7ZC1S015073 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Wed, 13 Feb 2013 02:35:13 -0500 Received: from psique (ovpn-113-130.phx2.redhat.com [10.3.113.130]) by int-mx02.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id r1D7Z9YI027435; Wed, 13 Feb 2013 02:35:11 -0500 From: Sergio Durigan Junior To: Franck Jullien Cc: gdb@sourceware.org Subject: Re: Lot of FAILs with gdb.base/structs.exp References: X-URL: http://www.redhat.com Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2013 07:35:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: (Franck Jullien's message of "Wed, 13 Feb 2013 08:00:54 +0100") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.3 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2013-02/txt/msg00040.txt.bz2 On Wednesday, February 13 2013, Franck Jullien wrote: >>> I'm working on OpenRISC GDB 7.5 port. [...] Ok, sorry, I should have noticed this earlier. It's hard to help without seeing the actual patches, etc. I looked at the OpenRISC website and noticed that they say "...there are still many regression failures [with the GDB 7.2 port], which remain to be investigated.", so it is really hard to say whether this regression you're seeing is your fault or not. I suggest you either (a) post what you're doing somewhere or (b) contact the toolchain development team from the OpenRISC project (best). Sorry for not being able to help more. -- Sergio