From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-return-8027-listarch-gdb=sourceware.cygnus.com@sources.redhat.com>
Received: (qmail 29105 invoked by alias); 12 Mar 2002 17:31:06 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-subscribe@sources.redhat.com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/gdb/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb@sources.redhat.com>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-help@sources.redhat.com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-owner@sources.redhat.com
Received: (qmail 28996 invoked from network); 12 Mar 2002 17:30:48 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO dell-pe2450-3.cambridge.redhat.com) (195.224.55.225)
  by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 12 Mar 2002 17:30:48 -0000
Received: from north-pole.nickc.cambridge.redhat.com (host217-34-95-29.in-addr.btopenworld.com [217.34.95.29])
	by dell-pe2450-3.cambridge.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 09CBD84D52; Tue, 12 Mar 2002 17:30:47 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from north-pole.nickc.cambridge.redhat.com.nickc.cambridge.redhat.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by north-pole.nickc.cambridge.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id A2CC31BBDB; Tue, 12 Mar 2002 17:31:02 +0000 (GMT)
To: Andrew Cagney <ac131313@cygnus.com>
Cc: geoffk@redhat.com, cgd@broadcom.com, bje@redhat.com,
	fche@redhat.com, gdb@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: [maint] sim and common
References: <3C85A44B.6090403@cygnus.com>
From: Nick Clifton <nickc@cambridge.redhat.com>
Date: Tue, 12 Mar 2002 09:31:00 -0000
In-Reply-To: <3C85A44B.6090403@cygnus.com>
Message-ID: <m3adtditgu.fsf@north-pole.nickc.cambridge.redhat.com>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.0808 (Gnus v5.8.8) Emacs/21.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-SW-Source: 2002-03/txt/msg00108.txt.bz2

Hi Andrew,

> I'm wondering if it would be helpful for sim specific maintainers
> (at least for sim/common based sims) to have implicit approval/write
> permission on the sim/common directory.

I think that this would be a good idea - at least for target-specific
modifications to the common code base.

> Which reminds me, Stephane Carrez should really be listed as the 
> m68hc11 maintainer.  Unless, that is, GDB is going to assume that a 
> GDB target maintainer implicitly maintains the corresponding SIM.

I think that there probably is this assumption, but there is no harm
in making certain cases explicit, so I would say go ahead and do it.

Cheers
        Nick