From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 8589 invoked by alias); 6 Aug 2007 14:07:24 -0000 Received: (qmail 8459 invoked by uid 22791); 6 Aug 2007 14:07:23 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from smtp-out.google.com (HELO smtp-out.google.com) (216.239.33.17) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Mon, 06 Aug 2007 14:07:19 +0000 Received: from zps75.corp.google.com (zps75.corp.google.com [172.25.146.75]) by smtp-out.google.com with ESMTP id l76E6CCd025674; Mon, 6 Aug 2007 15:06:16 +0100 Received: from smtp.corp.google.com (spacemonkey1.corp.google.com [192.168.120.115]) by zps75.corp.google.com with ESMTP id l76E63rP023565 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Mon, 6 Aug 2007 07:06:03 -0700 Received: from localhost.localdomain.google.com (204.sub-75-208-42.myvzw.com [75.208.42.204]) (authenticated bits=0) by smtp.corp.google.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id l76E5dE7024963 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Mon, 6 Aug 2007 07:05:57 -0700 To: Bob Rossi Cc: Eli Zaretskii , gdb@sourceware.org, dewar@adacore.com, b07584@freescale.com, rgetz@blackfin.uclinux.org, jimb@codesourcery.com Subject: Re: Posting from work/university addresses References: <200708021302.37222.rgetz@blackfin.uclinux.org> <46B2101F.6060305@adacore.com> <20070802183431.GA6833@ednor.casa.cgf.cx> <20070803231205.GB11438@ednor.casa.cgf.cx> <20070804200423.GB21125@cox.net> From: Ian Lance Taylor In-Reply-To: <20070804200423.GB21125@cox.net> User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.4 Date: Mon, 06 Aug 2007 14:07:00 -0000 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2007-08/txt/msg00055.txt.bz2 Bob Rossi writes: > I think Eli has a very good point in this matter. It is very easy for a > group of talented people to say "trust us, we are doing the correct > thing". However, over time, the people change, and other motivating > factors can creep in. I agree its best to keep all policy about this > matter open. If everyone is doing the right thing, then there is > absolutely nothing to hide, right? or perhaps you are afraid that if > the spammers know what you are blocking, then they will get good at > spamming... Chris already said that he would post details at a later date, when the implementation had been tested. Ian