From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 9492 invoked by alias); 6 Sep 2007 14:38:23 -0000 Received: (qmail 9481 invoked by uid 22791); 6 Sep 2007 14:38:23 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mail.codesourcery.com (HELO mail.codesourcery.com) (65.74.133.4) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Thu, 06 Sep 2007 14:38:19 +0000 Received: (qmail 2960 invoked from network); 6 Sep 2007 14:38:18 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO localhost) (jimb@127.0.0.2) by mail.codesourcery.com with ESMTPA; 6 Sep 2007 14:38:18 -0000 To: Vladimir Prus Cc: gdb@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: MI: "^running" issues References: <200709041653.22357.ghost@cs.msu.su> <18142.15716.179444.106490@kahikatea.snap.net.nz> <200709050938.45290.ghost@cs.msu.su> From: Jim Blandy Date: Thu, 06 Sep 2007 15:03:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: (Vladimir Prus's message of "Wed, 05 Sep 2007 22:41:38 +0400") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.0.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2007-09/txt/msg00050.txt.bz2 Vladimir Prus writes: > Unfortunately, I never saw more concrete details. What commands are actually > meaningful to emit while target are running and are those commands of big > enough value to user to warrant extensive coding? Can interested parties document > those commands at GDB Wiki, or even in email? It would be nice if GDB could stop one thread and examine its state while allowing the other threads to continue running. GDB's asynchronous mode is a prerequisite for that.