From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 22523 invoked by alias); 27 Aug 2009 15:45:57 -0000 Received: (qmail 22514 invoked by uid 22791); 27 Aug 2009 15:45:55 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Thu, 27 Aug 2009 15:45:45 +0000 Received: from int-mx01.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx01.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.11]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id n7RFjIWK030987; Thu, 27 Aug 2009 11:45:19 -0400 Received: from ns3.rdu.redhat.com (ns3.rdu.redhat.com [10.11.255.199]) by int-mx01.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id n7RFjH4d026544; Thu, 27 Aug 2009 11:45:18 -0400 Received: from opsy.redhat.com (ovpn01.gateway.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.9.1]) by ns3.rdu.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id n7RFjGdE020339; Thu, 27 Aug 2009 11:45:17 -0400 Received: by opsy.redhat.com (Postfix, from userid 500) id 23B693782A9; Thu, 27 Aug 2009 09:45:16 -0600 (MDT) From: Tom Tromey To: Joel Brobecker Cc: Michael Snyder , gdb@sourceware.org Subject: Re: Build gdb without installing termcap? References: <4A958C03.3060801@vmware.com> <20090826220833.GC6540@adacore.com> <20090826225340.GF6540@adacore.com> Reply-To: tromey@redhat.com Date: Thu, 27 Aug 2009 16:51:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: <20090826225340.GF6540@adacore.com> (Joel Brobecker's message of "Wed, 26 Aug 2009 18:53:40 -0400") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.1 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2009-08/txt/msg00261.txt.bz2 >>>>> "Joel" == Joel Brobecker writes: Tom> I don't think there is anything specific to termcap, but you should be Tom> able to set CPPFLAGS and LDFLAGS on the configure command line. Joel> I can't remember the details, but I sort of remember that we couldn't Joel> make it work just using these variables... Maybe I'm wrong, it was Joel> a while ago. Yeah, I remember now too: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=8751 I wonder whether Ralf's recent auto* upgrade helped with this. I'm guessing not but I didn't check. The reversion message sheds some light on the problem: http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/2008-11/msg00326.html Tom