From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-return-38768-listarch-gdb=sources.redhat.com@sourceware.org>
Received: (qmail 19598 invoked by alias); 2 Mar 2011 16:12:22 -0000
Received: (qmail 19589 invoked by uid 22791); 2 Mar 2011 16:12:20 -0000
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.3 required=5.0	tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,SPF_HELO_PASS,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28)    by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Wed, 02 Mar 2011 16:12:15 +0000
Received: from int-mx01.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx01.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.11])	by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id p22GBqMl019492	(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK);	Wed, 2 Mar 2011 11:11:52 -0500
Received: from hase (ovpn01.gateway.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.9.1])	by int-mx01.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id p22GBnbF022875;	Wed, 2 Mar 2011 11:11:50 -0500
From: Andreas Schwab <schwab@redhat.com>
To: Joel Brobecker <brobecker@adacore.com>
Cc: "dpc\@ucore.info" <dpc@ucore.info>, Tristan Gingold <gingold@adacore.com>,        Pedro Alves <pedro@codesourcery.com>, gdb@sourceware.org,        Mike Frysinger <vapier@gentoo.org>
Subject: Re: gdb + remote qemu, Ctrl-C does not work
References: <AANLkTimvhnQs_4gTkaU_xfgjnm0G=Qkm-ZdzVYJ9nmfK@mail.gmail.com>	<201103020945.11471.pedro@codesourcery.com>	<AANLkTi=1y6RLZakkA3A=xTnqWNKhCg2s7Ka9nzLsjQE-@mail.gmail.com>	<201103021249.34558.pedro@codesourcery.com>	<0EA5A1E3-9098-457F-9334-74476345C908@adacore.com>	<AANLkTimJFgP3_bjSQ78=sziy1q1t1e1VKUTS=fLfnNiK@mail.gmail.com>	<20110302150359.GB2513@adacore.com>
X-Yow: I smell a RANCID CORN DOG!
Date: Wed, 02 Mar 2011 16:12:00 -0000
In-Reply-To: <20110302150359.GB2513@adacore.com> (Joel Brobecker's message of	"Wed, 2 Mar 2011 19:03:59 +0400")
Message-ID: <m3aahdfqnu.fsf@redhat.com>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.2 (gnu/linux)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gdb.sourceware.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-subscribe@sourceware.org>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb@sourceware.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-help@sourceware.org>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org
X-SW-Source: 2011-03/txt/msg00022.txt.bz2

Joel Brobecker <brobecker@adacore.com> writes:

> That's only the case with interactive shells! In non-interactive
> shell sessions (typically a script), background process are still
> launched with the same process group as the parent script.

This is not about interactive vs. non-interactive, but a matter of job
control.  You can enable/disable job control independent of whether the
shell is interactive.

Andreas.

-- 
Andreas Schwab, schwab@redhat.com
GPG Key fingerprint = D4E8 DBE3 3813 BB5D FA84  5EC7 45C6 250E 6F00 984E
"And now for something completely different."