From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 18683 invoked by alias); 16 Jan 2009 16:24:38 -0000 Received: (qmail 18414 invoked by uid 22791); 16 Jan 2009 16:24:38 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.1 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KAM_MX,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx2.redhat.com (HELO mx2.redhat.com) (66.187.237.31) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Fri, 16 Jan 2009 16:24:02 +0000 Received: from int-mx2.corp.redhat.com (int-mx2.corp.redhat.com [172.16.27.26]) by mx2.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id n0GGNa6N031841; Fri, 16 Jan 2009 11:23:36 -0500 Received: from ns3.rdu.redhat.com (ns3.rdu.redhat.com [10.11.255.199]) by int-mx2.corp.redhat.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id n0GGNaJI024495; Fri, 16 Jan 2009 11:23:36 -0500 Received: from opsy.redhat.com (vpn-13-28.rdu.redhat.com [10.11.13.28]) by ns3.rdu.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id n0GGNZjk004409; Fri, 16 Jan 2009 11:23:35 -0500 Received: by opsy.redhat.com (Postfix, from userid 500) id 9B15237813B; Fri, 16 Jan 2009 09:23:33 -0700 (MST) To: teawater Cc: Joel Brobecker , David Daney , gdb@sourceware.org, =?utf-8?Q?S=C3=A9rgio?= Durigan =?utf-8?Q?J=C3=BAnior?= Subject: Re: Discussing the next GDB release (GDB 7.0?) References: <20090115034552.GF24105@adacore.com> <496F7115.9010903@caviumnetworks.com> <20090115173646.GC31296@adacore.com> <20090116033948.GI31296@adacore.com> From: Tom Tromey Reply-To: tromey@redhat.com Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2009 16:24:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: (teawater@gmail.com's message of "Fri\, 16 Jan 2009 14\:31\:36 +0800") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.2 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2009-01/txt/msg00096.txt.bz2 >>>>> "teawater" =3D=3D teawater writes: teawater> And I think "catch syscall" meet the same problem too. S=C3=A9rg= io send 3 teawater> PINGs for third submit. Based on recent traffic on the archer list, I think it will need a new submissions -- a few bugs were found. Tom