From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 26181 invoked by alias); 15 Jun 2009 19:27:54 -0000 Received: (qmail 26173 invoked by uid 22791); 15 Jun 2009 19:27:53 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.3 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (66.187.233.31) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Mon, 15 Jun 2009 19:27:46 +0000 Received: from int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (int-mx1.corp.redhat.com [172.16.52.254]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id n5FJRjme024533 for ; Mon, 15 Jun 2009 15:27:45 -0400 Received: from ns3.rdu.redhat.com (ns3.rdu.redhat.com [10.11.255.199]) by int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id n5FJRifs009130 for ; Mon, 15 Jun 2009 15:27:44 -0400 Received: from opsy.redhat.com (vpn-13-64.rdu.redhat.com [10.11.13.64]) by ns3.rdu.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id n5FJRiIa032555; Mon, 15 Jun 2009 15:27:44 -0400 Received: by opsy.redhat.com (Postfix, from userid 500) id 4554B3784BE; Mon, 15 Jun 2009 13:27:43 -0600 (MDT) To: Vladimir Prus Cc: gdb@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: Modify address of a gdb.Value References: <629542d40906142322h733ad7ffr3d6daeb7b306ff7a@mail.gmail.com> From: Tom Tromey Reply-To: tromey@redhat.com Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2009 19:27:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: (Vladimir Prus's message of "Mon\, 15 Jun 2009 21\:05\:04 +0400") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.2 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2009-06/txt/msg00161.txt.bz2 >>>>> "Vladimir" == Vladimir Prus writes: Tom> Nobody has implemented inferior function calls using Value yet. Vladimir> Boo. Is this something hard, or is expected soon? I don't know. As far as I know nobody has looked into it. Tom