From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 1283 invoked by alias); 26 Jun 2009 18:06:56 -0000 Received: (qmail 1130 invoked by uid 22791); 26 Jun 2009 18:06:56 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.3 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx2.redhat.com (HELO mx2.redhat.com) (66.187.237.31) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Fri, 26 Jun 2009 18:06:51 +0000 Received: from int-mx2.corp.redhat.com (int-mx2.corp.redhat.com [172.16.27.26]) by mx2.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id n5QI6elx009566; Fri, 26 Jun 2009 14:06:40 -0400 Received: from ns3.rdu.redhat.com (ns3.rdu.redhat.com [10.11.255.199]) by int-mx2.corp.redhat.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id n5QI6dSh023865; Fri, 26 Jun 2009 14:06:39 -0400 Received: from opsy.redhat.com (vpn-225-10.phx2.redhat.com [10.3.225.10]) by ns3.rdu.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id n5QI6cJV021593; Fri, 26 Jun 2009 14:06:38 -0400 Received: by opsy.redhat.com (Postfix, from userid 500) id AF1F9508250; Fri, 26 Jun 2009 12:06:37 -0600 (MDT) To: Paul Pluzhnikov Cc: =?utf-8?B?QW5kcsOpIFDDtm5pdHo=?= , gdb@sourceware.org Subject: Re: Learn function name by its address References: <8763ekb9ql.fsf@sphinx.net.ru> <8ac60eac0906250853y3f70e3b1y2bf97674b1e83d7b@mail.gmail.com> <200906260838.31341.andre.poenitz@nokia.com> <8ac60eac0906260004t4b78c1ffv47eedd2ecb4662f4@mail.gmail.com> <8ac60eac0906261035g7ad07e7fx6af9af503775b6f8@mail.gmail.com> From: Tom Tromey Reply-To: tromey@redhat.com Date: Fri, 26 Jun 2009 18:06:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: <8ac60eac0906261035g7ad07e7fx6af9af503775b6f8@mail.gmail.com> (Paul Pluzhnikov's message of "Fri\, 26 Jun 2009 10\:35\:22 -0700") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.2 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2009-06/txt/msg00255.txt.bz2 >>>>> "Paul" == Paul Pluzhnikov writes: Paul> I think removing them would be incorrect: they do exist, MI accepts them, Paul> they just don't work :-( Ugh. That seems even worse. Paul> Perhaps add a "NOTE: This command has not yet been implemented" Paul> to each one? Or also nuke the non-working entries from the MI command table. I can't think of a reason we'd want to have non-functional commands. I'm sure we'd reject a new patch that added such a command. Tom