From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 24690 invoked by alias); 21 Jul 2009 18:02:58 -0000 Received: (qmail 24549 invoked by uid 22791); 21 Jul 2009 18:02:57 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.3 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx2.redhat.com (HELO mx2.redhat.com) (66.187.237.31) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Tue, 21 Jul 2009 18:02:51 +0000 Received: from int-mx2.corp.redhat.com (int-mx2.corp.redhat.com [172.16.27.26]) by mx2.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id n6LI2maa025185; Tue, 21 Jul 2009 14:02:48 -0400 Received: from ns3.rdu.redhat.com (ns3.rdu.redhat.com [10.11.255.199]) by int-mx2.corp.redhat.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id n6LI2Tg8021075; Tue, 21 Jul 2009 14:02:36 -0400 Received: from opsy.redhat.com (ovpn01.gateway.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.9.1]) by ns3.rdu.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id n6LI2SHS029935; Tue, 21 Jul 2009 14:02:28 -0400 Received: by opsy.redhat.com (Postfix, from userid 500) id 51B9850800D; Tue, 21 Jul 2009 10:57:51 -0600 (MDT) To: Thiago Jung Bauermann Cc: Oguz Kayral , gdb ml Subject: Re: GSoC Status Report #3 References: <36a35d480907180812j398bb1ax8889ab1eefca9127@mail.gmail.com> <200907202305.22350.thiago.bauermann@gmail.com> <200907211436.51662.thiago.bauermann@gmail.com> From: Tom Tromey Reply-To: Tom Tromey Date: Tue, 21 Jul 2009 18:02:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: <200907211436.51662.thiago.bauermann@gmail.com> (Thiago Jung Bauermann's message of "Tue\, 21 Jul 2009 14\:36\:50 -0300") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.3 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2009-07/txt/msg00167.txt.bz2 >>>>> "Thiago" == Thiago Jung Bauermann writes: Thiago> Just to be clear: the GSoC work is NOT under the Archer Thiago> umbrella. So it doesn't have to follow the Archer rules. And I Thiago> strongly prefer that the branch name doesn't start with the Thiago> archer- prefix. That is fine by me. The only reason for the archer- prefix is to avoid clashes with any branch names from gdb; but probably any name including "oguz" is also unlikely to cause problems :-) Tom