From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 27981 invoked by alias); 22 Jul 2003 09:20:13 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 27747 invoked from network); 22 Jul 2003 09:20:10 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (66.187.233.31) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 22 Jul 2003 09:20:10 -0000 Received: from int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (int-mx1.corp.redhat.com [172.16.52.254]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id h6M9KAH29441; Tue, 22 Jul 2003 05:20:10 -0400 Received: from pobox.corp.redhat.com (pobox.corp.redhat.com [172.16.52.156]) by int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id h6M9KAI25902; Tue, 22 Jul 2003 05:20:10 -0400 Received: from localhost.localdomain.redhat.com (vpn50-9.rdu.redhat.com [172.16.50.9]) by pobox.corp.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id h6M9K2v21307; Tue, 22 Jul 2003 05:20:08 -0400 To: gdb@sources.redhat.com Cc: binutils@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: What to do with info addr and location expressions References: <16152.3014.959070.885970@localhost.redhat.com> <20030718153016.GA17382@nevyn.them.org> <3F18175E.30607@redhat.com> <3F1C4E14.6050007@redhat.com> <200307212045.h6LKjGld007821@envy.delorie.com> From: Nick Clifton Date: Tue, 22 Jul 2003 09:20:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: <200307212045.h6LKjGld007821@envy.delorie.com> (DJ Delorie's message of "Mon, 21 Jul 2003 16:45:16 -0400") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.1001 (Gnus v5.10.1) Emacs/21.2 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-SW-Source: 2003-07/txt/msg00279.txt.bz2 Hi Guys, > > Andrew wrote: > > That would mean bundling the binutils directory in with GDB. Hmm ... > DJ replied: > bfd/ perhaps? Except that that then ruins the plan that readelf should be buildable without libbfd.a. > Doug wrote: > > I'd rather not have gdb ship with ./binutils. OK. > Why not create a new TLD named elf or dwarf or some such and include > it in binutils and gdb distributions. > > I don't have an opinion on whether one would care whether this particular > directory has multiple libraries (libelf, libdwarf). > If one finds that unpalatable, call it dwarf and begin a libdwarf now > (or whatever). It needed be all-singing/all-dancing in its first cut. I would be open to this idea. Cheers Nick