From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 12970 invoked by alias); 22 Jul 2003 15:33:34 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 12641 invoked from network); 22 Jul 2003 15:33:29 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (66.187.233.31) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 22 Jul 2003 15:33:29 -0000 Received: from int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (int-mx1.corp.redhat.com [172.16.52.254]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id h6MFXSH16917; Tue, 22 Jul 2003 11:33:28 -0400 Received: from pobox.corp.redhat.com (pobox.corp.redhat.com [172.16.52.156]) by int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id h6MFXSI03037; Tue, 22 Jul 2003 11:33:28 -0400 Received: from localhost.localdomain.redhat.com (vpn50-9.rdu.redhat.com [172.16.50.9]) by pobox.corp.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id h6MFXJv28981; Tue, 22 Jul 2003 11:33:25 -0400 To: DJ Delorie Cc: gdb@sources.redhat.com, binutils@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: What to do with info addr and location expressions References: <16152.3014.959070.885970@localhost.redhat.com> <20030718153016.GA17382@nevyn.them.org> <3F18175E.30607@redhat.com> <3F1C4E14.6050007@redhat.com> <200307212045.h6LKjGld007821@envy.delorie.com> <200307221326.h6MDQ3LY020016@envy.delorie.com> From: Nick Clifton Date: Tue, 22 Jul 2003 15:33:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: <200307221326.h6MDQ3LY020016@envy.delorie.com> (DJ Delorie's message of "Tue, 22 Jul 2003 09:26:03 -0400") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.1001 (Gnus v5.10.1) Emacs/21.2 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-SW-Source: 2003-07/txt/msg00282.txt.bz2 Hi DJ, >> > DJ replied: >> > bfd/ perhaps? >> >> Except that that then ruins the plan that readelf should be buildable >> without libbfd.a. > > Don't build it with libbfd. Just keep it in the same directory. > There's no rule that says we can only have one library per directory. Doh! Yes, I should have realised that. But that does mean that GDB would need the bfd/ sources, not just an installed libbfd.a. Is this OK with the GDB guys ? If so, then I have no objections. Cheers Nick