From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 14088 invoked by alias); 28 Feb 2007 00:47:47 -0000 Received: (qmail 14080 invoked by uid 22791); 28 Feb 2007 00:47:47 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mail.codesourcery.com (HELO mail.codesourcery.com) (65.74.133.4) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Wed, 28 Feb 2007 00:47:43 +0000 Received: (qmail 6720 invoked from network); 28 Feb 2007 00:47:41 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO localhost) (jimb@127.0.0.2) by mail.codesourcery.com with ESMTPA; 28 Feb 2007 00:47:41 -0000 To: Mark Kettenis Cc: drow@false.org, eliz@gnu.org, dewar@adacore.com, nickrob@snap.net.nz, jan.kratochvil@redhat.com, Mathieu.Lacage@sophia.inria.fr, gdb@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [RFC] Signed/unsigned character arrays are not strings References: <17887.62990.937672.281975@kahikatea.snap.net.nz> <20070224161315.GA27534@caradoc.them.org> <17888.39894.136355.447008@kahikatea.snap.net.nz> <1172390381.2584.18.camel@mathieu> <20070225195350.GA12811@host0.dyn.jankratochvil.net> <20070226004457.GA9926@caradoc.them.org> <17892.4014.160191.285423@kahikatea.snap.net.nz> <45E42969.1030007@adacore.com> <20070227131442.GA20718@caradoc.them.org> <20070227215316.GA26262@caradoc.them.org> <200702272211.l1RMBVvI028239@brahms.sibelius.xs4all.nl> From: Jim Blandy Date: Wed, 28 Feb 2007 01:59:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: (Jim Blandy's message of "Tue, 27 Feb 2007 16:42:31 -0800") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.0.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2007-02/txt/msg00290.txt.bz2 Jim Blandy writes: > Because of the way C works, heuristics about what's textual and what's > numeric are inevitable here. Whether or not you like the one I'm > suggesting, we should definitely consolidate the heuristic in one > place, so it's consistent. And what I really want to know is, when I read this thread in Gmail, why does Google offer me an ad for "Lingerie in Leather"?