From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 12804 invoked by alias); 26 Jul 2009 05:04:20 -0000 Received: (qmail 12582 invoked by uid 22791); 26 Jul 2009 05:04:17 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.3 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx2.redhat.com (HELO mx2.redhat.com) (66.187.237.31) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Sun, 26 Jul 2009 05:04:12 +0000 Received: from int-mx2.corp.redhat.com (int-mx2.corp.redhat.com [172.16.27.26]) by mx2.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id n6Q53t6q007563; Sun, 26 Jul 2009 01:03:55 -0400 Received: from ns3.rdu.redhat.com (ns3.rdu.redhat.com [10.11.255.199]) by int-mx2.corp.redhat.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id n6Q53rEj005523; Sun, 26 Jul 2009 01:03:54 -0400 Received: from opsy.redhat.com (ovpn01.gateway.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.9.1]) by ns3.rdu.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id n6Q53qkv003650; Sun, 26 Jul 2009 01:03:52 -0400 Received: by opsy.redhat.com (Postfix, from userid 500) id 1DC3E3784CE; Sat, 25 Jul 2009 23:03:50 -0600 (MDT) To: nickrob@snap.net.nz (Nick Roberts) Cc: "Marc Khouzam" , Subject: Re: [RFC] Queries and frontends References: <6D19CA8D71C89C43A057926FE0D4ADAA07C00023@ecamlmw720.eamcs.ericsson.se> <19045.23703.743876.775308@totara.tehura.co.nz> From: Tom Tromey Reply-To: tromey@redhat.com Date: Sun, 26 Jul 2009 05:04:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: <19045.23703.743876.775308@totara.tehura.co.nz> (Nick Roberts's message of "Tue\, 21 Jul 2009 18\:13\:43 +1200") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.3 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2009-07/txt/msg00207.txt.bz2 >>>>> "Nick" == Nick Roberts writes: Nick> Here's a revised patch for my original request. It doesn't help Nick> with issues relating to GDB/MI but just uses the "server prefix" Nick> instead of a special option. My initial reaction to this was to think that defaulted_query should respect server_command. Is there a case where this would do the wrong thing? Tom