From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 5364 invoked by alias); 21 Aug 2009 17:32:20 -0000 Received: (qmail 5351 invoked by uid 22791); 21 Aug 2009 17:32:18 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.4 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Fri, 21 Aug 2009 17:32:12 +0000 Received: from int-mx04.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx04.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.17]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id n7LHW8oE008503; Fri, 21 Aug 2009 13:32:08 -0400 Received: from ns3.rdu.redhat.com (ns3.rdu.redhat.com [10.11.255.199]) by int-mx04.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id n7LHW7Eb020028; Fri, 21 Aug 2009 13:32:08 -0400 Received: from opsy.redhat.com (ovpn01.gateway.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.9.1]) by ns3.rdu.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id n7LHW6me000510; Fri, 21 Aug 2009 13:32:06 -0400 Received: by opsy.redhat.com (Postfix, from userid 500) id 05DEB3782EF; Fri, 21 Aug 2009 11:32:06 -0600 (MDT) From: Tom Tromey To: Paul Pluzhnikov Cc: Marco van de Voort , gdb@sourceware.org Subject: Re: errors in GDB reading symbols References: <20090807204753.8BC8C33CA1@turtle.stack.nl> <8ac60eac0908111756g6a9f679x6bc084ed7e53f39b@mail.gmail.com> Reply-To: tromey@redhat.com Date: Fri, 21 Aug 2009 17:33:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: <8ac60eac0908111756g6a9f679x6bc084ed7e53f39b@mail.gmail.com> (Paul Pluzhnikov's message of "Tue, 11 Aug 2009 17:56:01 -0700") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.1 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2009-08/txt/msg00211.txt.bz2 >>>>> "Paul" == Paul Pluzhnikov writes: Tom> Second, libgdb.a slows down the build, which is Tom> pointless for something we don't support. Paul> Can't the second reason be removed by making libgdb.a a separate Paul> (optional) make target? Let people who need libgdb.a type "make Paul> libgdb.a" :-) Yeah, that would work for me. It seems ok considering that we don't install libgdb.a, so anybody using it already must have a gdb tree around. But, given the push-back on removing this, I think I will just leave it the way it is. Tom