From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 31146 invoked by alias); 2 Sep 2009 15:12:48 -0000 Received: (qmail 31135 invoked by uid 22791); 2 Sep 2009 15:12:48 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.4 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Wed, 02 Sep 2009 15:12:43 +0000 Received: from int-mx01.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx01.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.11]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id n82FCcZD009113; Wed, 2 Sep 2009 11:12:38 -0400 Received: from ns3.rdu.redhat.com (ns3.rdu.redhat.com [10.11.255.199]) by int-mx01.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id n82FCb3j004639; Wed, 2 Sep 2009 11:12:38 -0400 Received: from opsy.redhat.com (ovpn01.gateway.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.9.1]) by ns3.rdu.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id n82FCaYs010875; Wed, 2 Sep 2009 11:12:37 -0400 Received: by opsy.redhat.com (Postfix, from userid 500) id 9154A378242; Wed, 2 Sep 2009 09:12:28 -0600 (MDT) From: Tom Tromey To: Hui Zhu Cc: gdb@sourceware.org Subject: Re: Does gdb can handle longjmp in i386 and amd64 now? References: Reply-To: tromey@redhat.com Date: Wed, 02 Sep 2009 15:12:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: (Hui Zhu's message of "Wed, 2 Sep 2009 22:22:23 +0800") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.1 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2009-09/txt/msg00018.txt.bz2 >>>>> ">" == Hui Zhu writes: >> I try the following code with gdb in i386 and amd64: This is http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=9270. glibc's PC mangling confuses gdb. Pedro has a patch for this; I keep forgetting what is holding it back. Tom