From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 2853 invoked by alias); 24 Feb 2011 14:40:27 -0000 Received: (qmail 2840 invoked by uid 22791); 24 Feb 2011 14:40:26 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.9 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,SPF_HELO_PASS,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Thu, 24 Feb 2011 14:40:18 +0000 Received: from int-mx12.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx12.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.25]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id p1OEeH95019578 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Thu, 24 Feb 2011 09:40:17 -0500 Received: from ns3.rdu.redhat.com (ns3.rdu.redhat.com [10.11.255.199]) by int-mx12.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id p1OEeHdX005000; Thu, 24 Feb 2011 09:40:17 -0500 Received: from opsy.redhat.com (ovpn01.gateway.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.9.1]) by ns3.rdu.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id p1OEeGJr026274; Thu, 24 Feb 2011 09:40:16 -0500 Received: by opsy.redhat.com (Postfix, from userid 500) id EAEBB378388; Thu, 24 Feb 2011 07:40:15 -0700 (MST) From: Tom Tromey To: Michael Snyder Cc: "gdb\@sourceware.org" Subject: Re: question, re: gdb.base/label.exp References: <4D658D9B.80207@vmware.com> Date: Thu, 24 Feb 2011 14:40:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: <4D658D9B.80207@vmware.com> (Michael Snyder's message of "Wed, 23 Feb 2011 14:43:39 -0800") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.2 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2011-02/txt/msg00135.txt.bz2 >>>>> "Michael" == Michael Snyder writes: Michael> Tom, does this test have a dependency on the compiler version? Michael> It's failing on my RHEL5 system with cvs/head gdb. It might, but I am not certain. I looked through the gdb-patches archives but my original mail didn't say anything; nor did the PR. You can check pretty easily with `readelf -wi' on the `labels' executable that is made by the test suite. Search the output for the `there' DIE. I get: <2>: Abbrev Number: 8 (DW_TAG_label) DW_AT_name : (indirect string, offset: 0xc4): there DW_AT_decl_file : 1 DW_AT_decl_line : 13 DW_AT_low_pc : 0x804840c I think the important parts are that (1) it exists and (2) it has a DW_AT_low_pc. Tom