From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 2056 invoked by alias); 20 Apr 2011 20:13:26 -0000 Received: (qmail 2043 invoked by uid 22791); 20 Apr 2011 20:13:24 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.9 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,SPF_HELO_PASS,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Wed, 20 Apr 2011 20:13:09 +0000 Received: from int-mx02.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx02.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.12]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id p3KKD6TV019653 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Wed, 20 Apr 2011 16:13:06 -0400 Received: from ns3.rdu.redhat.com (ns3.rdu.redhat.com [10.11.255.199]) by int-mx02.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id p3KKD6MG030992; Wed, 20 Apr 2011 16:13:06 -0400 Received: from opsy.redhat.com (ovpn01.gateway.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.9.1]) by ns3.rdu.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id p3KKD5c3028493; Wed, 20 Apr 2011 16:13:06 -0400 Received: by opsy.redhat.com (Postfix, from userid 500) id 6213037808F; Wed, 20 Apr 2011 14:13:05 -0600 (MDT) From: Tom Tromey To: Marc Khouzam Cc: "'gdb\@sourceware.org'" Subject: Re: Does multi-exec make sense without target-async? References: Date: Wed, 20 Apr 2011 20:13:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: (Marc Khouzam's message of "Wed, 20 Apr 2011 14:35:26 -0400") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.2 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2011-04/txt/msg00127.txt.bz2 >>>>> "Marc" == Marc Khouzam writes: Marc> I originally thought of using 'continue -a' Marc> to resume all inferiors, but the -a flag Marc> is only for non-stop it seems. IIRC, when I was recently playing with multi-inferior, I could not get "continue -a" to resume all inferiors. Is this supposed to work? (It might have been the case that this was prevented from working by some other bug...) Tom