From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 103135 invoked by alias); 6 Oct 2017 09:17:01 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 103125 invoked by uid 89); 6 Oct 2017 09:17:01 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-2.1 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KAM_LAZY_DOMAIN_SECURITY,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW autolearn=no version=3.3.2 spammy=Hx-languages-length:968, website X-HELO: mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com Received: from mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (HELO mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com) (148.163.156.1) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Fri, 06 Oct 2017 09:16:59 +0000 Received: from pps.filterd (m0098404.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (8.16.0.21/8.16.0.21) with SMTP id v969FG6F111080 for ; Fri, 6 Oct 2017 05:16:58 -0400 Received: from e06smtp13.uk.ibm.com (e06smtp13.uk.ibm.com [195.75.94.109]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 2de3tfshtk-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT) for ; Fri, 06 Oct 2017 05:16:58 -0400 Received: from localhost by e06smtp13.uk.ibm.com with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted for from ; Fri, 6 Oct 2017 10:16:55 +0100 Received: from b06cxnps3074.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (9.149.109.194) by e06smtp13.uk.ibm.com (192.168.101.143) with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted; Fri, 6 Oct 2017 10:16:54 +0100 Received: from d06av21.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (d06av21.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com [9.149.105.232]) by b06cxnps3074.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id v969GrU522479094; Fri, 6 Oct 2017 09:16:53 GMT Received: from d06av21.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4CB5B52043; Fri, 6 Oct 2017 09:11:30 +0100 (BST) Received: from oc1027705133.ibm.com (unknown [9.152.212.164]) by d06av21.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2429E52041; Fri, 6 Oct 2017 09:11:30 +0100 (BST) From: Andreas Arnez To: Eli Zaretskii Cc: Pedro Alves , brobecker@adacore.com, gdb@sourceware.org Subject: Re: SVG version of GDB mascot (archer fish) References: <20170925222843.n74fdmen4fygs4si@adacore.com> <3105e71c-9eab-fa68-6cb1-63ef9e0cdbb9@redhat.com> <83efqp8ztc.fsf@gnu.org> <918df632-2881-8d8b-68a9-a30a227ebc3b@redhat.com> <83tvzfx99b.fsf@gnu.org> <83sheyyhrm.fsf@gnu.org> Date: Fri, 06 Oct 2017 09:17:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: <83sheyyhrm.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Wed, 04 Oct 2017 19:55:41 +0300") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.2 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00 x-cbid: 17100609-0012-0000-0000-0000057EECA3 X-IBM-AV-DETECTION: SAVI=unused REMOTE=unused XFE=unused x-cbparentid: 17100609-0013-0000-0000-000018F862EC Message-Id: X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10432:,, definitions=2017-10-06_02:,, signatures=0 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_notspam policy=outbound score=0 spamscore=0 suspectscore=0 malwarescore=0 phishscore=0 adultscore=0 bulkscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.0.1-1707230000 definitions=main-1710060135 X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2017-10/txt/msg00017.txt.bz2 On Wed, Oct 04 2017, Eli Zaretskii wrote: >> Cc: arnez@linux.vnet.ibm.com, brobecker@adacore.com, gdb@sourceware.org >> From: Pedro Alves >> Date: Wed, 4 Oct 2017 15:48:06 +0100 >> >> >> "Verbatim copying and distribution of this entire article is permitted >> >> in any medium, provided this notice is preserved." >> > >> > You mean, the www.gnu.org site? It doesn't have to be, since it is >> > not software. >> >> The GDB website, the only place where the mascot image is used, >> and what the patches in this thread are about. > > Then I guess my comments should be disregarded. I thought the image > was proposed for something GDB-related. Well, there's still the point Pedro mentioned -- On Wed, Oct 04 2017, Pedro Alves wrote: > But in any case, I agree that it's good to upgrade the license to > avoid questions if we ever want to combine it with GPLv3 sources. Any objections? -- Andreas