From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 14407 invoked by alias); 6 Aug 2009 17:09:55 -0000 Received: (qmail 14391 invoked by uid 22791); 6 Aug 2009 17:09:54 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.3 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx2.redhat.com (HELO mx2.redhat.com) (66.187.237.31) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Thu, 06 Aug 2009 17:09:48 +0000 Received: from int-mx2.corp.redhat.com (int-mx2.corp.redhat.com [172.16.27.26]) by mx2.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id n76H7ivA030005; Thu, 6 Aug 2009 13:07:44 -0400 Received: from ns3.rdu.redhat.com (ns3.rdu.redhat.com [10.11.255.199]) by int-mx2.corp.redhat.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id n76H7gHD029779; Thu, 6 Aug 2009 13:07:43 -0400 Received: from opsy.redhat.com (ovpn01.gateway.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.9.1]) by ns3.rdu.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id n76H7fAW024399; Thu, 6 Aug 2009 13:07:42 -0400 Received: by opsy.redhat.com (Postfix, from userid 500) id DD10B37857C; Thu, 6 Aug 2009 11:07:40 -0600 (MDT) To: Jonas Maebe Cc: gdb@sourceware.org Subject: Re: errors in GDB reading symbols References: <97234C41-9CA5-4A2C-89BA-6B54256D8B81@gmail.com> <20090803170138.GA32482@caradoc.them.org> From: Tom Tromey Reply-To: tromey@redhat.com Date: Thu, 06 Aug 2009 17:09:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: (Jonas Maebe's message of "Tue\, 4 Aug 2009 16\:52\:04 +0200") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.3 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2009-08/txt/msg00044.txt.bz2 >>>>> "Jonas" == Jonas Maebe writes: Jonas> (although I really would appreciate it if someone could integrate the Jonas> GDB patches I submit, because even after pinging twice Jonas> http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/2009-06/msg00273.html still Jonas> appears to be in limbo). FWIW -- I try to review every patch that I think I have some chance of reviewing well. Unfortunately for you, your patches fall outside my zone of comfort. I do try to keep track of the unreviewed patches, but I'm not sure what to do with that information. All I can suggest is being more persistent and/or obnoxious in pinging :-). Jonas> The libgdb.a problem is also irrelevant to FPC's Mac OS X port, Jonas> because the text mode IDE that uses it is not supported on that Jonas> platform. Is libgdb.a still used on other platforms? I won't push forward on removing it if you still use it and you are reasonably active. While I would prefer that you switch to MI, I can understand that this is non-trivial. Tom