From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-return-14732-listarch-gdb=sources.redhat.com@sources.redhat.com>
Received: (qmail 23658 invoked by alias); 10 Jul 2003 14:40:12 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-subscribe@sources.redhat.com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/gdb/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb@sources.redhat.com>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-help@sources.redhat.com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-owner@sources.redhat.com
Received: (qmail 23248 invoked from network); 10 Jul 2003 14:40:01 -0000
Received: from unknown (63.201.54.26)
  by sources.redhat.com with QMTP; 10 Jul 2003 14:40:01 -0000
Received: (qmail 7443 invoked by uid 10); 10 Jul 2003 14:40:01 -0000
Received: (qmail 3549 invoked by uid 500); 10 Jul 2003 14:39:53 -0000
Mail-Followup-To: binutils@sources.redhat.com,
  gdb@sources.redhat.com,
  hjl@lucon.org
To: "H. J. Lu" <hjl@lucon.org>
Cc: binutils@sources.redhat.com, GDB <gdb@sources.redhat.com>
Subject: Re: FYI: A new C++ demangler
References: <20030710143557.GA25588@lucon.org>
From: Ian Lance Taylor <ian@airs.com>
Date: Thu, 10 Jul 2003 14:40:00 -0000
In-Reply-To: <20030710143557.GA25588@lucon.org>
Message-ID: <m33che8myu.fsf@gossamer.airs.com>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.2
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-SW-Source: 2003-07/txt/msg00123.txt.bz2

"H. J. Lu" <hjl@lucon.org> writes:

> I will put a new C++ demangler in Linux binutils, which should fix all
> known bugs in the old demangler. It is written in C++. It will be
> enabled only if there is a working C++ compiler. Otherwise, the old
> demangler will be used.

Are you coordinating with the g++ developers?

If not, this seems like a pointless exercise.

Ian