Mirror of the gdb mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jim Blandy <jimb@codesourcery.com>
To: Roland.Puntaier@br-automation.com
Cc: gdb@sourceware.org
Subject: Re: gdb-6.6 mingw port hangs after Ctrl-C
Date: Tue, 21 Aug 2007 17:42:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <m33aycg4yi.fsf@codesourcery.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20070821025607.GA14389@ednor.casa.cgf.cx> (Christopher Faylor's message of "Mon, 20 Aug 2007 22:56:07 -0400")


Christopher Faylor <cgf-use-the-mailinglist-please@sourceware.org>
writes:
> On Mon, Aug 20, 2007 at 03:31:28PM -0400, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
>>On Mon, Aug 20, 2007 at 10:16:12PM +0300, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
>>> The way to fix this is to make the signal handler stop the main thread
>>> as the first thing it does.  Then you have a Posix-compliant program
>>> again.  I did something similar for the MinGW port of GNU Make.
>>
>>Is there any way to force the other thread to longjmp?  Otherwise,
>>just stopping it isn't enough - you don't have the right stack.
>>Erm, maybe it would work anyway... longjmping from one thread to
>>another scares me a bit, though.
>
> This is why Cygwin's signal handling code is so complicated.
>
> You can stop another thread with a "SuspendThread()" call and you can
> cause the thread to resume in another location with a "ResumeThread()"
> by changing the EIP that is passed to it.  However, if you do that while
> you are in the middle of a low-level Windows function which, say, holds
> a mutex, then you are going to eventually run into problems.
>
> It's possible that this isn't a big problem for newer NT-based OSes but
> it was a show-stopper for the older versions of Windows and older
> versions of Windows NT.
>
> Cygwin works around this by not allowing itself to be suspended within a
> Cygwin1.dll function and checking for signal redirection at the end of
> any Cygwin function which references Windows.  If it notices that a
> signal came in then, instead of returning, the function will jump to the
> appropriate signal handler.  If the signal came in while user-level code
> was executing then the main thread is suspended and resumed at a new
> location which fixes up the stack so that the equivalent of a longjmp
> takes place.
>
> You *might* be able to make gdb do something similar to all of this but
> it would obviously be a lot of work.

GDB's quit_flag / immediate_quit / QUIT macro is set up for polling a
flag and handling interrupts at safe points.

The issue at hand here is that we need C-c to interrupt the main
thread as it reads from the remote host.  That could be a pipe, a
socket, or a serial port.

Do you know how one can safely interrupt each of these kinds of reads
in Windows?


  reply	other threads:[~2007-08-21 17:42 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 39+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-08-20 16:20 Roland Puntaier
2007-08-20 16:24 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2007-08-20 19:16   ` Eli Zaretskii
2007-08-20 19:31     ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2007-08-21  2:56       ` Christopher Faylor
2007-08-21 17:42         ` Jim Blandy [this message]
2007-08-21 19:09           ` Eli Zaretskii
2007-08-21 23:47             ` Jim Blandy
2007-08-22  3:13               ` Eli Zaretskii
2007-08-22 10:13                 ` Dave Korn
2007-08-22 19:17                   ` Eli Zaretskii
2007-08-24  9:19                     ` Roland Puntaier
2007-08-24 16:12                     ` Roland Puntaier
2007-08-21 22:55           ` Christopher Faylor
2007-08-22 11:10         ` Roland Puntaier
2007-08-22 19:20           ` Eli Zaretskii
2007-08-23  2:49             ` 答复: (Rising Spam Alert)Re: " xchen
2007-08-23  2:49             ` xchen
2007-08-23  2:49             ` xchen
2007-08-23  2:49             ` xchen
2007-08-23  2:49             ` xchen
2007-08-23  2:49             ` xchen
2007-08-23  2:49             ` xchen
2007-08-23  2:49             ` xchen
2007-08-23  2:49             ` xchen
2007-08-23  2:49             ` xchen
2007-08-23  2:49             ` xchen
2007-08-23  2:49             ` xchen
2007-08-23  2:49             ` xchen
2007-08-23  2:49             ` xchen
2007-08-23  2:49             ` xchen
2007-08-23  2:49             ` xchen
2007-08-23  2:49             ` xchen
2007-08-23  2:49             ` xchen
2007-08-23  2:49             ` xchen
2007-08-23  2:49             ` xchen
2007-08-23  2:49             ` xchen
     [not found]             ` <NUTMEGt3HvoFOAmEaJs0000003d@mail.artimi.com>
2007-08-23  9:30               ` Dave Korn
2007-08-21  3:22       ` Eli Zaretskii

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=m33aycg4yi.fsf@codesourcery.com \
    --to=jimb@codesourcery.com \
    --cc=Roland.Puntaier@br-automation.com \
    --cc=gdb@sourceware.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox