From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 8455 invoked by alias); 7 Jul 2009 21:48:30 -0000 Received: (qmail 8417 invoked by uid 22791); 7 Jul 2009 21:48:25 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.3 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (66.187.233.31) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Tue, 07 Jul 2009 21:48:16 +0000 Received: from int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (int-mx1.corp.redhat.com [172.16.52.254]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id n67LmExx015349 for ; Tue, 7 Jul 2009 17:48:15 -0400 Received: from ns3.rdu.redhat.com (ns3.rdu.redhat.com [10.11.255.199]) by int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id n67LmEgU001776 for ; Tue, 7 Jul 2009 17:48:14 -0400 Received: from opsy.redhat.com (vpn-225-86.phx2.redhat.com [10.3.225.86]) by ns3.rdu.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id n67LmEpv006172; Tue, 7 Jul 2009 17:48:14 -0400 Received: by opsy.redhat.com (Postfix, from userid 500) id 0158F508287; Tue, 7 Jul 2009 15:48:12 -0600 (MDT) To: Vladimir Prus Cc: gdb@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: Robustifying pretty-printers References: <200906131411.34204.vladimir@codesourcery.com> <200906161222.37208.vladimir@codesourcery.com> From: Tom Tromey Reply-To: Tom Tromey Date: Tue, 07 Jul 2009 21:48:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: <200906161222.37208.vladimir@codesourcery.com> (Vladimir Prus's message of "Tue\, 16 Jun 2009 12\:22\:36 +0400") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.2 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2009-07/txt/msg00051.txt.bz2 >>>>> "Vladimir" == Vladimir Prus writes: Vladimir> Exactly, they only limited the number of children sent to Vladimir> frontend. If we go this route, I think it is better to make Vladimir> -var-list-children take a couple of parameters to specify Vladimir> the desired range, with [0, whatever] as default -- as Vladimir> opposed to the previous approach where this limit should be Vladimir> set on varobj, not on individual -var-list-children call. Just to be clear, do you also want these options on -var-update? Or should it remember the previous values passed via -var-list-children? Tom