From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 1497 invoked by alias); 10 Oct 2009 18:30:48 -0000 Received: (qmail 1489 invoked by uid 22791); 10 Oct 2009 18:30:48 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.4 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Sat, 10 Oct 2009 18:30:44 +0000 Received: from int-mx02.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx02.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.12]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id n9AIR48C024989; Sat, 10 Oct 2009 14:27:04 -0400 Received: from ns3.rdu.redhat.com (ns3.rdu.redhat.com [10.11.255.199]) by int-mx02.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id n9AIR3NJ014205; Sat, 10 Oct 2009 14:27:03 -0400 Received: from opsy.redhat.com (ovpn01.gateway.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.9.1]) by ns3.rdu.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id n9AIR2e5030980; Sat, 10 Oct 2009 14:27:02 -0400 Received: by opsy.redhat.com (Postfix, from userid 500) id 44084378212; Sat, 10 Oct 2009 12:27:02 -0600 (MDT) From: Tom Tromey To: Pedro Alves Cc: gdb@sourceware.org, Dave Korn , Michael Snyder Subject: Re: A strange gcc behavior, and an argument against -Wno-unused References: <4ACFD8B7.4090902@vmware.com> <4ACFF3C7.3030802@gmail.com> <200910101745.27358.pedro@codesourcery.com> Reply-To: tromey@redhat.com Date: Sat, 10 Oct 2009 18:30:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: <200910101745.27358.pedro@codesourcery.com> (Pedro Alves's message of "Sat, 10 Oct 2009 17:45:26 +0100") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.1 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2009-10/txt/msg00195.txt.bz2 >>>>> "Pedro" == Pedro Alves writes: Pedro> Yeah. I think Aleksandar's "-Wall patches" patch Pedro> series must have fixed most of these already. Unfortunately, Pedro> the patch was so large, that it ended up dropped on Pedro> the floor. I thought he didn't want to write a ChangeLog entry for it. I'm happy to review it, regardless of size, if I don't have to write the ChangeLog. Tom