From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 29177 invoked by alias); 29 Jun 2008 15:36:09 -0000 Received: (qmail 29154 invoked by uid 22791); 29 Jun 2008 15:36:07 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (66.187.233.31) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Sun, 29 Jun 2008 15:35:28 +0000 Received: from int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (int-mx1.corp.redhat.com [172.16.52.254]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id m5TFZOZe018035; Sun, 29 Jun 2008 11:35:24 -0400 Received: from pobox.corp.redhat.com (pobox.corp.redhat.com [10.11.255.20]) by int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id m5TFZNOH006520; Sun, 29 Jun 2008 11:35:23 -0400 Received: from opsy.redhat.com (vpn-10-29.bos.redhat.com [10.16.10.29]) by pobox.corp.redhat.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id m5TFZN7H001093; Sun, 29 Jun 2008 11:35:23 -0400 Received: by opsy.redhat.com (Postfix, from userid 500) id 6D394378267; Sun, 29 Jun 2008 09:32:02 -0600 (MDT) To: Mark Kettenis Cc: drow@false.org, gdb@sourceware.org Subject: Re: Automatic dependency tracking References: <200806152203.14626.pedro@codesourcery.com> <20080616012617.GA8944@caradoc.them.org> <20080625182858.GA25575@caradoc.them.org> <200806281920.m5SJKAQI008684@brahms.sibelius.xs4all.nl> From: Tom Tromey Reply-To: Tom Tromey X-Attribution: Tom Date: Sun, 29 Jun 2008 15:36:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: (Tom Tromey's message of "Sat\, 28 Jun 2008 13\:30\:46 -0600") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.1 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2008-06/txt/msg00311.txt.bz2 >>>>> "Tom" == Tom Tromey writes: Tom> FWIW, rewriting the patch I sent to avoid GNU make is likely to Tom> be pretty fiddly & painful. So much for guessing. Now I think it isn't too bad, if we do not mind having dependencies only in the GNU make case. Daniel> So timestamps shouldn't matter; the only new failure mode is Daniel> that if you modify a header, the source files including it Daniel> might not be automatically rebuilt. I am happy to implement this, but it will be a major regression for folks not using GNU make. Tom