From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 25426 invoked by alias); 9 Jan 2012 14:52:40 -0000 Received: (qmail 25278 invoked by uid 22791); 9 Jan 2012 14:52:38 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-7.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,SPF_HELO_PASS,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Mon, 09 Jan 2012 14:52:16 +0000 Received: from int-mx01.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx01.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.11]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id q09EqEfc006441 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Mon, 9 Jan 2012 09:52:14 -0500 Received: from ns3.rdu.redhat.com (ns3.rdu.redhat.com [10.11.255.199]) by int-mx01.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id q09EqEAV022609; Mon, 9 Jan 2012 09:52:14 -0500 Received: from barimba (ovpn01.gateway.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.9.1]) by ns3.rdu.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id q09EqCPE014918; Mon, 9 Jan 2012 09:52:13 -0500 From: Tom Tromey To: Sergio Durigan Junior Cc: gdb@sourceware.org, Pedro Alves Subject: Re: UST integration is broken References: Date: Mon, 09 Jan 2012 14:52:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: (Sergio Durigan Junior's message of "Sat, 07 Jan 2012 00:37:37 -0200") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.92 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2012-01/txt/msg00030.txt.bz2 >>>>> "Sergio" == Sergio Durigan Junior writes: Sergio> I also noticed that the header file ust/ust.h is not installed, thus Sergio> making the configure process useless. I am sending this message because Sergio> I am in doubt about what to do: should we completely remove the support Sergio> from GDB (since according to the commit message above, the Sergio> implementation is going to be revamp'ed), or just temporarily disable Sergio> it? I was going to send a patch for the latter, but decided to ask Sergio> first. I would just leave things as they are. When UST starts using the SDT probes, we can revisit the situation. Meanwhile, for your testing, I would just use an older version of UST. Tom