Re: PR13901

Andreas Schwab
2012-04-02T17:28:21Z

Pedro Alves <palves@redhat.com> writes:

> On 04/02/2012 05:22 PM, Andreas Schwab wrote:
>
>> Pedro Alves <palves@redhat.com> writes:
>>
>>> We can't make GDB fully compatible in all cases with what it can do today
>>> if we skip the shell completely. E.g., with "set args $(foo)", "$(foo)" is
>>> expanded by the shell, and what that means is up to the user's shell.
>>
>> You can handle that by calling the shell only for expanding the
>> arguments.
>
>
> True, but with that and redirection syntax being also shell
> specific, I'm not sure what would be the point compared to what
> we've always done.

You can do the expansion in a step that is completely separate from
starting the inferior. But you cannot handle redirections this way.

Andreas.

--
Andreas Schwab, schwab@linux-m68k.org
GPG Key fingerprint = 58CA 54C7 6D53 942B 1756 01D3 44D5 214B 8276 4ED5
"And now for something completely different."